COMPARISONS
AIM FORM vs RankedVote
RankedVote does one concrete thing well: ranked voting with round-by-round elimination (and other formats on its paid plans). AIM FORM starts on the same ground but looks at the decision from two angles —consensus (who draws the least rejection) and majority (rounds)—, warns when they differ and explains what each implies. One method gives you a winner; two tell you whether the decision is solid or contested.
The differences that matter
Two methods see what one hides
With rounds only, the top first-preference wins even if it splits the group. AIM FORM adds consensus (Borda) and flags when the two disagree —the sign of a contested decision.
The why, not just the result
AIM FORM explains with the figures why each count wins and what it means when they disagree. The group makes the decision.
Free, no voter cap
According to its pricing page, RankedVote's free plan allows one contest, up to 100 voters and 10 candidates. In AIM FORM, votes and voters are unlimited.
Head to head
| AIM FORM | RankedVote | |
|---|---|---|
| Their turf | Group decisions | Ranked voting |
| Free plan | Unlimited | 1 contest, 100 voters, 10 candidates |
| Counting methods | Two (consensus + majority) | Rounds (other formats, paid) |
| Disagreement flagged | Yes | No |
| Automatic minutes with a verifiable fingerprint | Yes | No |
When RankedVote is the better choice
- If you want ranked voting with rounds exclusively, nothing else.
- If you prefer a minimal utility focused on that single method.
- If you need neither the consensus count nor verifiable minutes.
RankedVote's facts were checked on 27 September 2026 in its pricing page and its key features.
Let your group decide. And know why.
Free, no response cap. No card.