COMPARISONS
AIM FORM vs Mentimeter
Mentimeter is excellent for energising a room: word clouds, live votes on the slide. Where AIM FORM separates is after the vote: it doesn't stop at the chart —it crowns the winner two ways, flags disagreement and leaves the minutes done— and it all fits in the free plan. Menti energises; AIM FORM settles.
The differences that matter
Energising the room vs closing the decision
In its ranking slides, Menti hands out points (the Borda method). AIM FORM adds the count by rounds (majority) and warns when the two differ.
Transparent method, not just a chart
AIM FORM shows both counts and explains the why with the figures. It's a defensible decision, not a pretty bar.
Free, no participant cap
According to its plans page, Mentimeter's free plan allows 50 participants a month (and unlimited participants once a month). In AIM FORM, your vote has no participant cap.
Head to head
| AIM FORM | Mentimeter | |
|---|---|---|
| Their turf | Group decisions | Voting in presentations |
| Participants on the free plan | Unlimited | 50 a month (unlimited once a month) |
| Double count | Yes | No: its ranking hands out points |
| Automatic minutes with a verifiable fingerprint | Yes | No |
| Live results and projector mode | Yes | Yes |
When Mentimeter is the better choice
- If you give talks and want the most polished live voting on the slide.
- If you want word clouds and large-audience live dynamics.
- If the goal is on-stage participation, not closing a decision with criteria.
Mentimeter's facts were checked on 27 September 2026 in its plans page and its ranking slides help.
Let your group decide. And know why.
Free, no response cap. No card.