COMPARISONS
AIM FORM vs RankedVote
RankedVote does one concrete thing well: ranked voting with round-by-round elimination. AIM FORM starts on the same ground but looks at the decision from two angles —consensus (who draws the least rejection) and majority (rounds)— warns when they differ, and the AI explains what each implies. One method gives you a winner; two tell you whether the decision is solid or contested.
The differences that matter
Two methods see what one hides
With rounds only, the top first-preference wins even if it splits the group. AIM FORM adds consensus (Borda) and flags when the two disagree —the sign of a contested decision.
The why, not just the result
AIM FORM reads the full context of the vote and the AI explains why each method wins and what to decide. RankedVote stops at the count.
Part of a product, not a standalone utility
Live results, projection mode with QR, free text and ratings live inside the same decision. It's voting within a decision tool, not an isolated ballot box.
Head to head
| AIM FORM | RankedVote | |
|---|---|---|
| Their turf | Group decisions | Ranked voting |
| Counting methods | Two (consensus + majority) | One (rounds) |
| Disagreement flagged | Yes | No |
| AI verdict + reasoning | Yes | No |
| Projection mode for the room | Yes | No |
When RankedVote is the better choice
- If you want ranked voting with rounds exclusively, nothing else.
- If you prefer a minimal utility focused on that single method.
- If you need no consensus, verdict or live results.
Let your group decide. And know why.
Free, no response cap. No card.