Template
Course evaluation
Course and teacher rated separately — not the same thing — a usefulness scale and the open field where the truth lives. The AI reads every comment and hands you the headline.
Who it's for: Trainers, academies and internal L&D teams.
No card · Opens already built in your editor
-
Rate the course overall *★★★★★
-
Rate the teacher *★★★★★
-
How useful was it for you? (1–10) *
-
What would you keep, what would you change?
When to use it
- A training ends and you need the standard evaluation: course, instructor and usefulness, comparable across editions.
- You teach the same course repeatedly and want to catch a weak edition and why.
- Your funder or quality seal requires documented evaluation of every training action.
What's inside and why
- Rate the course overall (stars)
- The headline grade: quick and comparable across editions.
- Rate the instructor (stars)
- Deliberately separate from the course: a great instructor with poor materials (or vice versa) only shows if you ask separately.
- How useful was it for you? (1–10)
- The question that predicts recommendation: you can enjoy a useless course and suffer through a vital one. The fine scale lets you compare editions.
- What would you keep and what would you change?
- Two questions in one: protect what works, prioritize what doesn't. The AI separates and clusters both lists.
Tips to get the most out of it
- Run it in the last 5 minutes of class, not after: in-room evaluation triples the response rate of the follow-up email.
- Compare editions, not absolute values: a 4.2 that used to be 4.6 says more than the 4.2 alone.
- If the instructor is external, share the results: it's feedback they almost never get, and it improves the next edition.
Frequently asked questions
Do students have to identify themselves?
No: the template is anonymous by default, which raises honesty. If you must certify who answered (funded training), add a name or email field in the editor.
Can I reuse the template for several courses?
Create one form per course or edition (duplicating takes one click): each gets its own link, QR and separate results, so you can compare editions cleanly.
How do I compare the March edition with June's?
Each form keeps its results and averages. Open both in two tabs or export both CSVs — and look at usefulness and instructor separately: that's where differences show.